In CRLMC No.5389 of 2015, the High Court of Orissa dismissed a petition. The petitioner did not appear. The respondent A.G.A. submitted that seized properties were not covered by the relevant Act rules. The court dismissed the application based on this submission.
The CRLMC was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMC No.5389 of 2015
Uttam Kumar Nayak @ Gandua …. Petitioners and another
Mr. S.S. Kanungo, Advocate
-versus-
…. State of Orissa Opp. Party Mr.P.K. Pattnaik, A.G.A.
CORAM:
JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY
Order No.
ORDER 15.12.2022
( G. Satapathy) Judge
Priyajit
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow a Criminal Miscellaneous Application regarding properties not covered under Section 21 of the M.M.D.R. Act and Rule 18(1) of the O.M.PTS TMR PST & T Rules.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Uttam Kumar Nayak @ Gandua
State of Orissa
G. Satapathy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
