Bilasini Mallik v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed the petition seeking quashing of the trial court's refusal to discharge the petitioners in a Section 307 IPC case, holding the order exhibited no illegality or impropriety requiring interference.
What did the court decide?
The Criminal Misc. Case stood dismissed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMC No.529 of 2011
Bilasini Mallik and others
…. Petitioners
versus-
…. State of Orissa Opposite Party
CORAM: JUSTICE S. PUJAHARI
Order No.
ORDER
07.03.2022
- This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
- This application under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. has been
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court ought to quash the trial court's refusal to discharge the petitioners in the offence under Section 307 IPC.
Whether observations made in the bail application are binding on the trial court while considering a prayer for discharge.
Whether the impugned order refusing discharge suffers from any illegality or impropriety warranting interference.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Bilasini Mallik
- respondent
State of Orissa
Coram
S. Pujahari
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court