The High Court of Orissa, lacking instructions from petitioner's counsel, dismissed the CRLMC for want of instruction without further merits.
CRLMC disposed of as dismissed for want of instruction.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMC No.3952 of 2016
Shree Metaliks Ltd., Keonjhar …. Petitioner Mr. S. Udgata, Advocate
-versus-
Kalinga Allied Industries, Sundargarh …. Opp. Party
CORAM:
JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY
Order No.
ORDER 13.10.2022
Subhasmita
Shree Metaliks Ltd., Keonjhar
Kalinga Allied Industries, Sundargarh
G. Satapathy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
