Debananda Tandi v. Pradip Purohit
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Orissa disposed of CRLMC No.3884 of 2016 as infructuous on the submission of learned counsel that the matter had become frivolous by the time the order was made.
The High Court of Orissa disposed of CRLMC No.3884 of 2016 as infructuous on the submission of learned counsel that the matter had become frivolous by the time the order was made.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMC No.3884 of 2016
Debananda Tandi
…. Petitioner Mr. M. Verma , Advocate
-versus-
Pradip Purohit
…. Opp. Party
CORAM:
JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY
ORDER
Order No.
28.10.2022
Priyajit
Debananda Tandi
Pradip Purohit
G. Satapathy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court