High Court quashed criminal proceedings in G.R. Case No. 1682 of 2018 arising from an FIR, exercising power under Section 482 Cr.P.C., due to a settlement between the petitioner and the informant documented by an affidavit.
Quashing order for G.R. Case No. 1682 of 2018 on file of S.D.J.M.(S), Cuttack arising out of Cuttack Mahila P.S. Case No. 81 of 2018.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMC No. 359 OF 2021
Bipin Bihari Samal & Others. ……… Petitioners
Mr. R.K. Prusty, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha & Another
...……… Opposite Parties Mr. D. Mund, AGA Mr. P.K. Mohanty, Adv for OP-2
CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH
ORDER
09.05.2022
Order No. 03. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode. 2. Heard Mr. R.K. Prusty, learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr. D. Mund, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State and Mr. P.K. Mohanty, learned counsel appearing for the Opposite Party No.2.
Page 1 of 2
“That, in view of the settlement I ado not want to proceed with the G.R. Case No. 1682 of 2018 pending in the Court of learned SDJM (S), Cuttack basing on the FIR lodged by me before the Mahila Police Station, Cuttack which is enclosed to CRLMC by the petitioner as Annexure-1. So, I have no objection if the prayer of the petitioner is allowed by quashing the G.R. Case No. 1682 of 2018 arising out of Mahila P.S. Case No. 81 of 2018 U/S 498(a), 307, 354-B , 294, 506, 34 of I.P.C and 4 D.P. Act.”
Balaram
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal proceedings in G.R. Case No. 1682 of 2018 should be quashed in view of the compromise between the parties.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Bipin Bihari Samal & Others
State of Odisha
V. Narasimh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
