CRLMC petition allowing an informant to appear and assist the Public Prosecutor while the trial court decides on framing a charge under Section 304-B IPC. The matter was disposed of without substantive ruling.
Gramin woman protection act 1997 and IPC 304-B charge direction given to trial court to consider
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMC No.3563 of 2016
Bishnu Dalai
…. Petitioner
Ms. P.Mohanty, Advocate
-versus-
…. Sudhansu Jena @ Jana and others Opp. Parties Mr. S.R. Roul, A.S.C.
CORAM:
JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY
Order No.
ORDER 13.12.2022
Page 1 of 2
// 2 //
if so advanced, at the time of consideration of charge in the aforesaid criminal case and pass an appropriate order in accordance with law. The Informant may assist the prosecution at the time of consideration of charge, but learned Public Prosecutor is not bound to consider the advice of the Informant, if the same is not in accordance with law. 5. Accordingly, the CRLMC is disposed of.
(G. Satapathy) Judge
Priyajit
Page 2 of 2
Bishnu Dalai
Sudhansu Jena @ Jana and others
G. Satapathy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
