Karunakar Nayak v. State of Odisha
Case brief
What is this about?
This criminal miscellaneous order addresses a petitioner who was on interim bail but failed to surrender. The High Court dismissed the challenge to the impugned arrest warrant and directed the petitioner to surrender to the Special POCSO court to apply for regular bail.
What did the court decide?
Direction to petitioner to surrender before the learned A.D.J.-cum-Special Judge, Bhadrak in Special POCSO Case No.40 of 2019 and apply for bail.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMC No.3414 of 2022
Karunakar Nayak
…. Petitioner
Mr. U.C. Jena, Advocate
-Versus-
State of Odisha
…. Opposite Parties
Mr. S.S. Mohapatra, ASC
CORAM: MR. JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK
Order No.
ORDER 25.11.2022
- Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State-opposite party.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a petitioner on interim bail who failed to appear should be directed to surrender and apply for regular bail before the trial court.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Karunakar Nayak
- respondent
State of Odisha
Coram
R.K. Pattanaik
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court