Petitioner challenged a notice under Section 110 Cr.P.C. directing appearance and show-cause filing. Bench declined interference, holding petitioner must file show-cause first before challenging any bond/undertaking order.
petitioner directed to appear before SDM and file show-cause; liberty to challenge final bond order later.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMC No.3268 of 2022
Rabindranath Thakur
…. Petitioner
Mr. R.K. Sahu, Advocate
-Versus-
State of Odisha
…. Opposite Parties
Mr. T.K. Praharaj, SC
CORAM:
MR. JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK
Order No.
ORDER 25.11.2022
Page 1 of 2
learned court below court below is to take a call and decision thereon and at this stage, it would not be appropriate to interfere with the impugned notice i.e. Annexure-2.
5. Accordingly, it is ordered.
(R.K. Pattanaik) Judge
TUDU
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with the notice issued under Section 110 Cr.P.C. directing the petitioner to appear and file a show cause.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rabindranath Thakur
State of Odisha
R.K. Pattanaik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
