High Court dismissed the criminal miscellaneous petition as the petitioners failed to appear despite having been given opportunities to prosecute the matter.
Petition dismissed due to non-appearance of petitioners.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMC No.2728 of 2016
Ramesh Chandra Lenka and another
…. Petitioners Mr. J. Sahoo, Advocate
-versus-
State of Orissa and another
…. Opp. Parties Mr. S.S. Pradhan, A.G.A.
CORAM:
JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY
ORDER
Order No.
28.11.2022
(G. Satapathy) Judge
Priyajit
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal miscellaneous petition should be dismissed after failure to appear.
Ramesh Chandra Lenka
Another
State of Orissa
Another
G. Satapathy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
