Makar@Subash Sahoo v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
Single judge order dismissing Criminal Misc. Complain No. 2596 of 2012 for non-prosecution as no petitioner appeared despite state counsel presence.
What did the court decide?
The case stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMC No.2596 of 2012
Makar @ Subash Sahoo and others …. Petitioners
-versus-
…. State of Orissa Opposite Party
CORAM: JUSTICE S. PUJAHARI
ORDER
Order 15.07.2022
No.
03. 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. No one appears on behalf of the Petitioners when the
matter is called. However, learned counsel for the State-
Opposite Party is present.
3. The case of the year 2012.
4. Hence, the CRLMC stands dismissed for non-
prosecution.
(S. Pujahari) Judge
DA
Page 1 of 1
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Makar @ Subash Sahoo and others
- respondent
State of Orissa
Coram
S. PUJAHARI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court