The High Court of Orissa dismissed a CRLMC application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of a cognizance order, noting that seven years had elapsed since the order without a stay, leading to a reasonable doubt on the survival of the cause of action.
CRLMC dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMC No.1961 of 2016
Kartika @ Kathia Jena & another
…. Petitioners Mr. S.K.Mohanty , Advocate
-versus-
State of Orissa & another
…. Opp. Parties Mr.S.R.Roul, A.S.c.
CORAM:
JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY
ORDER
Order No.
23.09.2022
( G. Satapathy)
Kishore
// 2 //
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the cause of action survives for quashing a cognizance order passed seven years prior when no stay was granted.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kartika @ Kathia Jena
another
State of Orissa
another
G. SATAPATHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
