In a criminal miscellaneous application seeking quashment of an FIR, the High Court of Orissa dismissed the petition for non-prosecution after the petitioner failed to appear. The court termed the litigants recalcitrant due to the case's age and lack of procedural status.
The application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMC No.1938 of 2011
Sarata Jena and others
Petitioners
versus-
…. State of Orissa and another Opposite Parties
CORAM: JUSTICE S. PUJAHARI
Order No.
ORDER
04.04.2022
Page 1 of 2
// 2 //
DA
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Criminal Miscellaneous Application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. should be dismissed for failure to appear?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sarata Jena and others
State of Orissa and another
S. Pujahari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
