In this CRLMC regarding a quashing prayer under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the High Court of Orissa noted the petitioner's submitted memo stating no instruction from clients. Viewing the litigants as recalcitrant, the Court dismissed the application for nonprosecution.
Application for quashing under Section 482 Cr.P.C. dismissed on grounds of nonprosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMC No.1802 of 2011
Dharma Sahu and others
…. Petitioners
versus-
Purnima Behera
…. Opposite Party
CORAM: JUSTICE S. PUJAHARI
Order No.
ORDER
04.05.2022
Page 1 of 2
// 2 //
DA
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the jurisdictional application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. should be dismissed due to the petitioner's file stating lack of instructions from clients.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Dharma Sahu and others
Purnima Behera
S. PUJAHARI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
