In a criminal miscellaneous case, the High Court of Orissa quashed the proceedings of a G.R. Case on the file of J.M.F.C., Cuttack, relying on the principle of compromise between the parties and a recent apex court decision.
Proceedings in connection with G.R. Case No. 2123 of 2020 stand quashed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMC No. 179 of 2022
Ramakanta Behera and …. Petitioners another
Mr. K. Pattnaik, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha and another
…. Opposite Parties
Mr. P. Mohapatra, ASC
CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH
ORDER 28.03.2022
Order No.
02.
Page 1 of 1
// 2 //
in connection with G.R. Case No.2123 of 2020, arising out of Cuttack Sadar P.S. Case No.493 of 2020, on the file of learned J.M.F.C., Cuttack, stands quashed in respect of the present petitioners in exercise of power under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to quash the G.R. Case proceeding on the ground of compromise between the parties.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Manoj Agarwal & Another v. The State of Uttar Pradesh & AnotherRelied on¶16
Manoj Agarwal & Another v. The State of Uttar Pradesh & Another
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ramakanta Behera
State of Odisha
V. NARASINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
