Petitioner challenged a non-bailable warrant issued for absence from trial. The High Court refused immediate interference due to delay but permitted surrender within six weeks for bail consideration by the court seisin of the matter.
Application dismissed; petitioner permitted to surrender within six weeks for bail consideration by the trial court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMC No.1778 of 2022
Hule @ Huleswar Bagarti …. Petitioner
-versus-
…. State of Odisha Opposite Party
CORAM: JUSTICE S. PUJAHARI
ORDER
Order No.
20.07.2022
Page 1 of 2
// 2 //
the trial Court and cooperate with the trial, the trial Court may be directed to release him on bail on any terms and conditions as it may deem just and proper.
N.B.W.(A).
7. With the aforesaid order, this CRLMC stands disposed of.
8. Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper
application.
(S. Pujahari)
Judge
DA
Page 2 of 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with the issuance of the non-bailable warrant despite the belated filing of the application.
Whether the petitioner should be permitted to surrender to the trial court for consideration of bail.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Hule @ Huleswar Bagarti
State of Odisha
S. PUJAHARI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
