Rajesh Ku Pramanik v. State of Maharastra
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed a Criminal revisional application for non-prosecution as there was no instruction from the petitioners.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMC No.16 of 2012
Rajesh Kumar Pramanik and another
Petitioners Mr. D. Panda, Advocate
-Versus-
State of Odisha and another
…. Opposite Parties
Mr. S.S. Mohapatra, Additional Standing Counsel
CORAM:
Order No.
MR. JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK
ORDER
15.07.2022
1. As submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners, there is no
instruction in the matter.
2. Considering such submission, the CRLMC stands dismissed for
non-prosecution.
(R.K. Pattanaik)
Judge
TUDU
Rajesh Kumar Pramanik
State of Odisha
R.K. Pattanaik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court