Dismissed

Akshay Halwa@Halba v. State of Odisha

Orissa HC30 Jun 2022CRLMC/1545/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking to quash an N.B.W.(A) issued against petitioners for non-appearance. The Court found no reason to interfere but invited surrender within six weeks for sympathetic bail consideration.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed; petitioners permitted to surrender within six weeks for sympathetic bail consideration.

Akshay Halwa@Halba Vs State of Odisha — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Orissa HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

¶2

CRLMC No.1545 of 2022

¶3

Akshaya Halwa @ Halba and another

¶4

…. Petitioners

¶5

-versus-

¶6

…. State of Odisha Opposite Party

¶7

CORAM: JUSTICE S. PUJAHARI

Order No.

ORDER 30.06.2022

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

¶12

Heard the learned counsel for the Petitioners and the learned counsel for the State.

¶13

This application under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. has been filed by the Petitioners with a prayer to quash the order dated 10^th November, 2021 passed by the learned Assistant Sessions Judge, Koraput in C.T. No.03 of 2020 wherein N.B.W.(A) has been issued against them.

¶14

It appears that the Petitioners, who have been indicted in the aforesaid case, were on bail and facing trial, but when the case was posted on 10^th November, 2021 for framing of charge, they did not appear before the Court below and no step was taken on their behalf on the date fixed, as such, N.B.W.(A) has

¶15

Page 1 of 3

¶16

// 2 //

¶17

been issued against them vide the aforesaid order to secure their attendance. However, the Petitioners have challenged the same in this petition, but during course of hearing, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the Petitioners that the Petitioners are now ready and willing to surrender before the trial Court and cooperate with the trial and as such, the trial Court may be directed to release them on bail on any terms and conditions as it may deem just and proper.

¶18

Considering the aforesaid facts and submissions made, especially the circumstances in which the N.B.W.(A) was issued, this Court finds no reason to interfere with the impugned order.

¶19

However, it is open to the Petitioner to surrender before the Court in seisin over the matter within six weeks hence and if he surrenders and moves for bail, the Court in seisin over the matter after framing of charge, consider such petition of the Petitioner sympathetically.

¶20

With the aforesaid order, this CRLMC stands disposed of.

¶21

Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application.

¶22

(S. Pujahari) Judge

Page 2 of 3

// 3 //

Page 3 of 3

Akshay Halwa@Halba v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Akshay Halwa@Halba v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Soumendra Singh Vs State

Panchanan Nayak Vs State of Odisha

Kalu Baral@Kiran Ku. Vs State

Nilagiri Das Vs State of Odisha

Akshya Parida@Akshya Kumar Parida Vs State of Odisha

Subash Chandra Tripathy Vs State of Odisha