Petitioner sought quashing of cognizance order alleging false allegations. High Court held proceeding is not fit for quashing but granted liberty to raise grounds during charge framing and directed surrender for bail.
Petition disposed without quashing; liberty granted to raise grounds during charge framing; petitioner directed to surrender for bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMC No. 146 of 2021
Anil Kumar Das
…. Petitioner
Mr. Susanta Kumar Baral, Advocate
-Versus-
State of Odisha and another
…. Opposite Parties Mr.Sidharth Shankar Mohapatra, ASC, OP No.1 None for OP No.2
CORAM:
MR. JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK ORDER 28.10.2022
Order No.
Page 1 of 3
submits that in order to wreak vengeance, the informant with malafide intention lodged the FIR whereupon chargesheet has been filed and the learned court below took cognizance of the offences under Sections 179, 183, 186, 353, 294, 506 IPC against the petitioner in G.R. Case No.231 of 2020.
Page 2 of 3
below has issued NBWA, the petitioner is to surrender before the learned J.M.F.C., Salipur on or before 11th November, 2022 in G.R. Case No.231 of 2020 arising out of Salipur P.S. Case No.109 of 2020 and in such an event, the learned court below shall release him on bail on such terms and conditions as deem just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.
U.K.Sahoo
(R.K. Pattanaik)
Judge
Page 3 of 3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal proceedings under Sections 179, 183, 186, 353, 294, 506 IPC should be quashed under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Anil Kumar Das
State of Odisha
R.K. Pattanaik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
