This is an application by the petitioner seeking restoration of a earlier criminal matter dismissed for non-prosecution. The High Court dismissed the application on merits, noting the petitioner was absent without valid reason as there were no obstacles to appearing.
The application for restoration is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMA No.310 of 2022
Kalpana Hota
…. Petitioner
Mr. G. Sethi, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha and others
…. Opposite Parties
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE
ORDER Order No. 16.12.2022 01. 1. This is an application by the Petitioner seeking restoration of CRLMC No.837 of 2017 which was dismissed for non-prosecution by an order dated 28th October, 2022.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice
S.K. Guin
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an application seeking restoration of a dismissed matter should be allowed in the absence of the petitioner.
Kalpana Hota
State of Odisha and others
S. Muralidhar
S. K. Guin
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
