The High Court of Odisha held that a contempt petition was allowable since the impugned order was complied with; it dropped the petition and directed a compliance.
The contempt petition was dropped; a compliance report was to be communicated to the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CONTC (CPC) No.79 of 2016
Rankanath Parida
…. Petitioner(s) Mr. D. Routray, Advocate
-versus-
Ranjana Chopra
…. Opposite Party(s) Mr. R.K. Samal, Advocate
CORAM: JUSTICE BISWANATH RATH
ORDER
Order No.
12.01.2022
1. This matter is taken up by video conferencing mode.
2. Keeping in view the statement made by the learned counsel
for the Opposite Party-Contemnor(s) that the order sought to be complied with in the Contempt Proceeding, is already complied with in the meantime, this Court finds, nothing survives in this Contempt Petition to be adjudicated upon by this Court any further, which is, hereby, dropped. A compliance report be communicated to the Petitioner.
3. As restrictions due to resurgence of COVID-19 situation are continuing, learned counsel for the parties may utilize a printout of the order available in the High Court’s website, at par with certified copy, subject to attestation by the concerned advocate, in the manner prescribed vide Court’s Notice No.4587, dated 25th March, 2020 as modified by Court’s Notice No.4798, dated 15th April, 2021 and Court’s Office order circulated vide memo Nos.514 & 515 dated 7th January, 2022.
(Biswanath Rath) Judge
A.K. Jena
Page 1 of 1
Rankanath Parida
Ranjana Chopra
Biswanath Rath
A. K. Jena
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
