In Contempt Proceeding No. 43 of 2016, the court observed that the order involved had been complied with in the meantime. Consequently, the contempt proceeding was dropped.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CONTC (CPC) No.43 of 2016 Bishnu Charan Routray …. Petitioner
Mr.B.Satpathy, Advocate
-versus-
L.N.Gupta, Secretary, …. Opposite Party(s) Industry Deptt. Mr.N.K.Praharaj, Advocate
CORAM: JUSTICE BISWANATH RATH
ORDER
04.01.2022
Order No.
01. 1. Mr.Praharaj, learned counsel appearing for the contemnors
submits that the order involved herein has been complied with in the
meantime. Compliance report be served on learned counsel appearing
for the petitioner.
Sks
Page 1 of 1
Bishnu Charan Routray
L.N. Gupta
Biswanath Rath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
