The court directed the incumbent to comply with a direction from O.A.No.2430(C) of 2009 within one and a half months or face a suo motu contempt proceeding.
Incumbent directed to work out compliance within one and a half months on pain of suo motu contempt proceeding.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CONTC(CPC) NO.116 OF 2016
Kailash Chandra Samanta
…. Petitioner
Mr.M.K.Sahoo, Advocate
-versus-
Ranjana Chopra & ors.
…. Opposite Party(s)
Mr.R.K.Samal, Adv.
CORAM: JUSTICE BISWANATH RATH
Order No.
ORDER 6.1.2022
1. Even though an objection is raised by learned Counsel for opposite party-contemnor(s) on the maintainability of the contempt proceeding involving contemnor herein, this Court observes, the direction issued in the final order in O.A.No.2430(C) of 2009 is not meant to be ignored or not complied. Even though notice in the contempt petition has been issued since long, no show cause or compliance affidavit has been filed as of now. To avoid further time, in disposal of the contempt petition, this Court observes in the event the direction issued in the said Original Application is not complied with as of now, the present incumbent is directed to work out the same within a period of one and half months hence, provided the order of the Tribunal is not challenged in higher forum with an order of stay of such order. The compliance report be filed before the Registry of this Court within a period of one week thereafter. Failure of compliance of this order shall be construed to be deliberate violation of this Court’s order and there will be initiation of a suo motu contempt proceeding against the contemnor(s).
(Biswanath Rath)
Judge
M.K.Rout
Page 1 of 1
Kailash Chandra Samanta
Ranjana Chopra
Biswanath Rath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
