Harilal Naik v. Harihar Sahoo
Case brief
What is this about?
This order records a single-paragraph disposal where the petitioner did not appear for the hearing and the contempt petition was dismissed for non-prosecution.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed for non-prosecution due to non-appearance.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CONTC No. 895 of 2008
Hiralal Naik and Another …. Petitioners None
-versus-
Harihar Sahoo and Another …. Opposite Parties Mr. D.R. Mohapatra, Senior Standing Counsel (School & Mass Education Department)
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK
ORDER
Order No. 25.04.2022
05. 1. None appears for the Petitioner.
2. The contempt petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar)
Chief Justice
(R.K. Pattanaik)
Judge
S.K. Jena/Secy.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Hiralal Naik
- respondent
Harihar Sahoo
Coram
R.K. Pattanaik
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court