Gokul Chandra Nayak v. Birendra Kumar Das
Case brief
What is this about?
In this contempt proceeding, the Court discharged the petitioner after holding that the main writ petition was disposed of on the same date as the order.
In this contempt proceeding, the Court discharged the petitioner after holding that the main writ petition was disposed of on the same date as the order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CONTC No.5978 of 2020
Gokul Chandra Nayak
..… Petitioner
Mr. Ranjit Mohanty, Advocate
-versus-
Birendra Kumar Das
…. Opp. Party
Mr. Sarojananda Mishra, Advocate
CORAM:
JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
Order No.
ORDER 22.07.2022
order of the even date, the CONTC is dropped.
(K.R. Mohapatra)
Judge
s.s.satapathy
Page 1 of 1
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
W.P.(C) No.24431 of 2020Referred¶16
Gokul Chandra Nayak
Birendra Kumar Das
K.R. MOHAPATRA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court