A contempt petition filed against the respondent was dismissed for non-prosecution. No matters were argued by the petitioner's counsel owing to lack of instructions. The case is disposed of without any substantive ruling on the prayer.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CONTC No.445 of 2011
Subash Chandra Panda and others …. Petitioners Mr. K.P. Mishra, Advocate -versus-
…. Bijoy Kumar Pattanaik and others Opposite Parties Mr. D.K. Mohanty, AGA
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE R. K. PATTANAIK
ORDER
10.05.2022
Order No.
09. 1. Learned counsel for the Petitioners states that he has no
instructions.
2. The contempt petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar)
Chief Justice
(R. K. Pattanaik)
Judge
TUDU
Subash Chandra Panda and others
Bijoy Kumar Pattanaik and others
R. K. Pattanaik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
