A contempt petition filed for non-compliance of a previous order was disposed of by extending one month time to the opposite party to comply, with a warning of deliberate violation if not met. No substantive law or precedent discussion is present.
Granted one month time to the Opposite Party to comply the earlier order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CONTC No.4290 of 2022
Dushasan Naik
….
Petitioner
-versus-
Ashish Thakare, Collector, …. Opposite Party Keonjhar
CORAM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
ORDER
25.07.2022
Order No
01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode.
2. This Contempt Petition has been filed by the Petitioner for noncompliance of the order dated 07.10.2021 passed by this Court in W.P.(C) No. 31378 of 2021.
3. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and upon hearing learned counsel for the Parties, this Contempt Petition is disposed of by granting one month further time to the Opp. PartyContemnor to comply the order passed on 07.10.2021. However, if the order is not complied with within the extended time, it will be held as deliberate violation of this Court’s order.
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge
Sneha
Dushasan Naik
Ashish Thakare
Biraja Prasanna Satapathy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
