Court disposed of a civil revision petition as infructuous because the petitioner-applicant had died in the meantime after the impugned order was passed.
CMP disposed of as infructuous and interim order dated 3rd February, 2020 vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CMP NO. 59 OF 2020
Rabindranath Sahoo
…. Petitioner
Mr. Bibekananda Bhuyan, Advocate
-versus-
Smt. Lalita Nayak and others
…. Opp. Parties
Mr. B.S. Tripathy, Advocate (For Opp. Party Nos.1 to 4)
CORAM:
JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
ORDER
Order No.
13.10.2022
January, 2020 (Annexure-5) passed by learned Senior Civil Judge, Second Court, Cuttack in C.S. No.86 of 2009, whereby an application filed by the Plaintiff-Petitioner under Order XXVI Rule 1 C.P.C. for examination of Plaintiff on commission has been rejected.
No. 67 of 2020 stands vacated.
(K.R. Mohapatra) Judge
bks
Page 1 of 1
Rabindranath Sahoo
Smt. Lalita Nayak and others
K.R. Mohapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
