Disposed

Odisha Power Transmission Corporation Ltd. . v. Antaryami Malik

Orissa HC22 Dec 2022CMP/1158/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought a certified copy of an order directing the learned Civil Judge to consider an application for impleadment and early disposal of an interim injunction case. The High Court issued the order conditionally.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the trial court to consider an application for impleadment and disposal of an interim injunction case if filed by the Petitioner.

Odisha Power Transmission Corporation Ltd… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Orissa HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

¶2

CMP No. 1158 of 2022

¶3

Odisha Power Transmission …. Petitioner Corporation Ltd. (OPTCL)

¶4

Mr. Pronoy Mohanty, Advocate

¶5

-versus-

¶6

Antaryami Malik and others …. Opp. Parties

¶7

CORAM: JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA

ORDER

Order No.

22.12.2022

This matter is taken up through Hybrid mode.

¶13

Petitioner in this CMP seeks for a direction for early disposal of IA No.18 of 2021 (arising out of CS No.22 of 2021) pending before learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Chandikhole.

¶14

It is submitted by Mr. Mohnaty, learned counsel for the Petitioner that the suit has been filed for permanent injunction. Along with the plaint, the Opposite Party No.1 filed an application under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC. It is his submission that in exercise of power under Order XXXIX Rule 3 CPC, learned trial Court by dispensing service of notice on Opposite Parties therein, granted an ex-parte ad interim order of injunction. The said order is continuing till date. The Plaintiff/Opposite Party No.1 has not impleaded the present Petitioner, who is a necessary party both to the suit as well as the IA. In view of the ad interim order of injunction, high tension line from Chandikhole Grid Sub-station to RTSS,

¶15

Page 1 of 1

¶16

// 2 //

¶17

Dhanamandal for electrification of railway track could not be proceeded. Petitioner has also filed an application to be impleaded as party to the suit as well as the IA. In spite of best effort of the Petitioner, learned trial Court has neither taken up the IA for impletion of the Petitioner as a party nor has disposed of the IA No.18 of 2021. Hence, the PetitionerCompany is seriously prejudiced. In that view of the matter, Mr. Mohanty, learned counsel submits that the IA should be disposed of at an early date. It is his submission that the IA is ready to be taken up for hearing and there is no legal impediment for the same.

¶18

Taking into consideration the submission of learned counsel for the Petitioner, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the submission made, disposes of the CMP with a direction that in the event Petitioner moves an application for early disposal of the IA both for impletion of party as well as disposal of IA No.18 of 2021, learned trial Court shall do well to consider the same and proceed with the matter expeditiously, if there is no legal impediment, keeping in mind that the IA No.18 of 2021 has been filed under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC.

¶19

Issue urgent certified copy of the order on proper application.

¶20

(K.R. Mohapatra) Judge

¶21

s.s.satapathy

¶22

Page 2 of 2

Odisha Power Transmission Corporation Ltd. . v. Antaryami Malik

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Odisha Power Transmission Corporation Ltd. . v. Antaryami Malik

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Swatishree Das Vs Debadutta Das

Panchanan Roul Vs State of Odisha

Utpal Das Vs Regional Manager,Rbi,Bbsr

Ganeshram Patel Vs State of Odisha

Geeta Kumari Sahu Vs Subhra Parijata Sahu

Manoj Kumar Sahoo Vs Rubina Sahoo