The High Court dismissed a Civil Miscellaneous Petition challenging a trial court's order rejecting an application to admit secondary evidence of a promissory note at the stage of arguments without prior application during evidence.
Decision to dismiss the Civil Miscellaneous Petition against the impugned order. Urgent certified copy granted on proper application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CMP No. 1101 OF 2022
Sana Bag
…. Petitioner
Mr. Saugat Dash, Advocate
-versus-
…. Rohita Bagarty and another Opp. Parties
CORAM:
JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
ORDER
Order No.
09.12.2022
Page 1 of 2
// 2 //
examining his witness, rejected such application. Hence, this CMP has been filed.
Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application.
ms
Page 2 of 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner was entitled to admit a copy of a promissory note as secondary evidence at the stage of arguments after failing to apply at the evidence stage.
Whether allowing admission of the promissory note would amount to abuse of the process of the court.
Sana Bag
Rohita Bagarty
K.R. Mohapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
