Dissatisfaction regarding the pendency of a civil suit led to a Criminal Procedure Code notice. The single-judge bench held the notice lacked merit as the suit was not ready for hearing and dismissed it.
No relief; the petition was dismissed as it was devoid of merit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CMP No. 1071 OF 2022
Jagabandhu Prusty …. Petitioner
Mr. Achyutananda Swain, Advocate
-versus-
…. Ramesh Chandra Prusty and others Opp. Parties
CORAM: JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
ORDER
Order No.
22.11.2022
Page 1 of 2
// 2 //
Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application.
(K.R. Mohapatra) Judge
Sangram Das
Page 2 of 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Court can direct early disposal of a suit where it is not ready for hearing.
Whether a notice under Criminal Procedure Code section 156(3) CrPC can be issued against civil suit pendency.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Jagabandhu Prusty
Ramesh Chandra Prusty and others
K.R. Mohapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
