The High Court observed that the Consumer Miscellaneous Petition involved a civil nature dispute and should be registered as a W.P. (Constitutional). The registry is directed to convert the CMP and list it before the assigned bench.
The registry is directed to convert the CMP as W.P.(C).
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CMP No. 1056 OF 2022
Rai Chandra Malik and others
…. Petitioners
Mr. S. Sourav, Advocate -versus-
…. State of Odisha and others Opp. Parties Mr. Swayambhu Mishra, Additional Standing Counsel (For Opp. Party No.1)
CORAM: JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
ORDER
Order No.
11.11.2022
ms
Page 1 of 1
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Consumer Miscellaneous Petition should have been registered as a Writ Petition (Constitutional).
Direction to the registry to convert the CMP into a W.P.(C).
Rai Chandra Malik and others
State of Odisha and others
K.R. Mohapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
