The respondent judge allowed the petition for restoration of W.P.(C) No.604/2020, which had been dismissed for non-prosecution on 02 August 2022, and disposed of the current CMAPL application.
Restoration of W.P.(C) No.604/2020 allowed; CMAPL disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CMAPL No.381 of 2022
Sudarsan Panda …. Petitioner
Mr. P.Ch.Panda, Advocate
-versus-
….
State of Odisha and others Opposite Parties
Mr. B.P.Tripathy, A.G.A
CORAM:
JUSTICE SASHIKANTA MISHRA
ORDER
Order No. 11.10.2022.
1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and leaned Addl.
Government Advocate for the State.
3. Considering the contentions raised by the learned counsel
for the Petitioner, the application for restoration is allowed.
W.P.(C) No.604/2020, which was dismissed for non-
prosecution on 2nd August, 2022 is restored to file.
4. CMAPL is accordingly disposed of.
(Sashikanta Mishra)
AKB Judge
Page 1 of 1
// 2 //
W.P.(C) No.604/2020
(Sashikanta Mishra) Judge
Page 2 of 3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition for restoration of a dismissed writ petition pending due to non-prosecution should be allowed.
Sudarsan Panda
State of Odisha and others
Sashikanta Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
