Single Judge of the High Court of Orissa dismissed two miscellaneous applications. The Court found an unexplained inordinate delay of 2463 days and refused to condone it, leading to the consequent dismissal of the pending CMAPL.
Condonation of delay for 2463 days rejected; CMAPL dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CMAPL No.20 of 2017
Rajlaxmi Parija
…. Petitioner
Mr. Gyanendra Kumar Tripathy, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha & Others
…. Opposite Parties Mr. Iswar Mohanty, ASC
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE
JUSTICE M. S. RAMAN
ORDER
22.12.2022
Order No.
Misc. Case No.13 of 2017 and CMAPL No.20 of 2017
There is an inordinate delay of 2463 days in filing the present CMAPL which has not been satisfactorily explained. Accordingly, the delay is not condoned. The Misc. Case for condonation of delay is dismissed. Consequently, the CMAPL is dismissed.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice
(M. S. Raman)
Judge
Laxmikant
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to condone a delay of 2463 days in filing the criminal miscellaneous application.
Rajlaxmi Parija
State of Odisha
M. S. Raman
S. Muralidhar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
