Odisha Lift Irrigation Corpn. Ltd. v. Subash Patnaik
Case brief
What is this about?
A petition for condonation of delay of 369 days in filing a CMAPL was allowed. The delay was condoned based on submissions and grounds taken in the IA. The CMAPL was restored to its original number, and both the IA and CMAPL were disposed of.
What did the court decide?
Delay of 369 days was condoned; CMAPL allowed and restored to original number; Both IA and CMAPL disposed of.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CMAPL No. 146 OF 2020
Odisha Lift Irrigation Corporation …. Petitioners Ltd., Bhubaneswar and others
Mr. S. Mohanty, Advocate
-versus-
Subash Patnaik and others
…. Opp. Parties Mr. Somnath Mishra, Advocate (For Opp. Party No.1)
CORAM:
JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
ORDER
Order No.
28.09.2022
CMAPL No. 146 OF 2020 & I.A. No.70 of 2022
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the I.A. for condonation of delay of 369 days in filing the CMAPL deserves condonation?
Whether the CMAPL and the IA for condonation of delay should be allowed and disposed of?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Odisha Lift Irrigation Corporation Ltd. and others
- respondent
Subash Patnaik and others
Coram
K.R. Mohapatra
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court