The High Court of Orissa rejected the prayer for bail for the petitioner charged with NDPS offences involving#endif summary
Interim bail for three months subject to terms including two sureties (one relative) and surrender by 9th March 2023.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK BLAPL No.9930 of 2022
Tanu@Tanmaya Kumar Bhuyan
…. Petitioner Mr. A.R. Panda, Advocate
-versus-
State of Orissa
…. Opposite Party Mr. K. Das, A.S.C.
CORAM: JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY
ORDER 06.12.2022
Order No.
Page 1 of 2
P.S. Case No.9/2020 corresponding to Special Case No.1/2021 on such terms and conditions to be fixed by learned 3rd Addl. Sessions Judge, Balasore as he deems just and proper including the condition that the Petitioner shall furnish two sureties (with proper identity proof) out of which one shall be his relative and that, he shall not be involved in any other offence while on bail and shall attend the trial court on each date fixed.
( B.P. Routray) Judge
B.K. Barik
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be released on bail considering the embargo under Section 37(1)(b) of the NDPS Act.',['../While the embargo in sec 37(1)(b) of NDPS Act prels release on bail due to serio
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Tanu@Tanmaya Kumar Bhuyan
State of Orissa
B. P. Routray
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
