Bapi@ Suryakanta Baral v. State of Odisha
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Orissa, in a hybrid mode hearing, rejected the bail prayer of the applicant due to the severity of allegations and prima facie evidence of complicity, advising a future application post-examination of witnesses.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
BLAPL No.9293 of 2021
Bapi @ Suryakanta Baral
…. Petitioner
Mr. S.C.Panda,
Advocate
-versus-
….
State of Odisha Opposite Party
Mr. P. Tripathy,
Addl. Standing Counsel
CORAM:
JUSTICE SASHIKANTA MISHRA
ORDER
06.01.2022.
Order No.
1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
- Heard Mr. S.C.Panda, learned counsel for the Petitioner and Mr. P. Tripathy, learned Addl. Standing Counsel for the State. 3. Having regard to the severity of the allegations and the availability of the materials prima facie to show the complicity of the Petitioner in the occurrence, I am not inclined to allow the prayer for bail, which is, therefore, rejected. It is open to the Petitioner to renew his prayer after examination of some material witnesses in this case.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the bail prayer ought to be allowed considering the severity of allegations and available prima facie evidence of complicity?
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Bapi @ Suryakanta Baral
Coram
Sashikanta Mishra
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court