Disposed
Siba Prasad Dash v. State of Odisha
Orissa HCBLAPL/9116/2021
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK BLAPL…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
BLAPL No.9116 of 2021
Siba Prasad Dash
Petitioner
Mr. S.K. Mishra, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha
…. Opp. Party
Mr. Arupananda Das, Addl. Government Advocate
CORAM:
Order No.
JUSTICE S.K. SAHOO ORDER 18.05.2022 I.A. No.810 of 2022
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that while granting interim bail to the petitioner as per the aforesaid order, the condition was fixed that the petitioner has to furnish bail bond of Rs.50,000/(rupees fifty thousand) with two local solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Court in seisin over the matter. It is further submitted that since the petitioner is a man from Fategarh and the case is now subjudiced in the Court
// 2 //
of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Phulbani and the case is of Phiringia police station, it is very difficult on the part of the petitioner to get local sureties and therefore, in case of local sureties, it may be ordered to furnish any two solvent sureties.
Learned counsel for the State has no objection. Considering the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the word ‘local’ in the operative portion of the bail order dated 22.04.2022 stands deleted.
With this modification, the rest part of the order dated 22.04.2022 remains unaltered. I.A. is accordingly disposed of. Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application. ( S.K. Sahoo) Judge
RKM
Page 2 of 2
Siba Prasad Dash
State of Odisha
S.K. Sahoo
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court