Rakesh Kumar v. State of Odisha
Case brief
What is this about?
In a bail petition, the petitioner agreed to supply fresh local sureties after the state counsel reported unavailability of existing ones. The case was listed for further proceedings.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
BLAPL No.8619 of 2021
Rakesh Kumar
…. Petitioner
Mr. J.K. Panda, Advocate
-versus-
Order No.
State of Odisha
…. Opp. Party
Mr. Manoranjan Mishra Addl. Standing Counsel CORAM: JUSTICE S.K. SAHOO ORDER 21.07.2023 This matter is taken up through Hybrid arrangement (video conferencing/physical mode). Learned counsel for the State submitted that instruction has been received from the Inspector incharge of Mudulipada police station on the local sureties to the effect that one of the surety is not interested to take the petitioner on bail and another surety is not residing in the village.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Rakesh Kumar
- respondent
State of Odisha
Coram
S.K. Sahoo
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · Aditya Kumar Mohapatra
- Order 2 · Gourishankar Satapathy
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court