This bail application by an accused facing trial for offences under Sections 498A, 302, and 201 IPC was allowed. The High Court granted bail considering the welfare of the petitioner's minor children.
Petitioner released on bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
BLAPL No. 8585 OF 2020
Gane Singh ……… Petitioner Mr. A.K. Parida, Adv.
-versus-
State of Orissa
...……… Opposite Party Mr. S.S. Mohapatra, ASC
CORAM:
JUSTICE V. NARASINGH
ORDER
11.03.2022
Order No. 04.
2
the Evidence Act states that, the act was committed in a fit of anger and there is no premeditation and it is also submitted that the petitioner has two sons aged about 8 years and 6 years and are facing difficulty in meeting the challenges of life in absence of the mother. Hence on humanitarian ground prays for consideration for bail application.
Balaram
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail on humanitarian grounds considering the welfare of his minor children and the period of detention.
Whether the petitioner's history of quarrelling and lack of mitigation circumstances negate the claim for bail.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Gane Singh
State of Orissa
V. Narasigh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
