Single Judge of the High Court of Orissa dismissed a bail application. The Court declined to entertain the prayer at that stage, holding examination of a prosecution witness is essential before considering the plea of innocence.
Bail application disposed of without granting relief; Petitioner to renew application later.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
BLAPL No.8140 of 2022
Manu @ Bariyal Tudu
…. Petitioner
Mr. A. Dash, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha
…. Opposite Party
Mr. A. Pradhan, ASC
CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH
ORDER
03.11.2022
Order No.
02.
Page 1 of 2
the case under Section 302 IPC is not made out. Hence, his further continuance in custody is not warranted.
(V. NARASINGH) Judge PKS
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the bail application should be entertained before the final recovery of the witness whose statement is pertinent to the case.
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Manu @ Bariyal Tudu
State of Odisha
V. Narasinh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
