Single judge of the High Court of Odisha, Cuttack, rejected a bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. Held that since the trial had commenced in the lower court, the application could not be entertained, though the court noted the trial must conclude within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
BLAPL No. 7418 of 2022
Budhuram Munda @ Tuyu & …. Petitioners Another
Mr. P.S. Das, Advocate -versus…. State of Odisha Opposite Party
Mr. K.K. Gaya, ASC
CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH
ORDER
24.08.2022
Order No.
01.
Page 1 of 2
of rejection that the four witnesses examined so far do not implicate the petitioners.
(V. NARASINGH)
Judge
Ayesha
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. should be entertained when the trial has already commenced in the lower court.
Buduram Munda @ Tuyu
State of Odisha
V. NARASINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
