The High Court allowed a bail application filed by an accused charged with murder under Sections 302/34 IPC, directing release on bail while fixing terms to ensure trial presence.
The BLAPL stands disposed with a direction to release the petitioner on bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
BLAPL No. 6824 of 2022
Santosh Jena
…. Petitioner
Mr. A. Tripathy, Advocate
-versus-
…. State of Orissa Opposite Party
Mr. A. Pradhan, ASC Mr. B.K. Sahoo, Advocate (Informant)
CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH
ORDER 23.11.2022
Order No.
04. 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
Page 1 of 2
already been filed and keeping in view the nature of allegations, his further continuance in custody is unwarranted.
(V. NARASINGH) Judge
Ayesha
Page 2 of 2
3 issues framed by the court
Whether an accused charged with murder under Section 302/34 IPC should be released on bail considering the dying declaration and post mortem report.
Whether the impairment of potable water is an objective element of the offence under Section 218 of IPC.
Whether the State has the right to sexual self-determination.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Santosh Jena
State of Orissa
V. Narasimh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
