Sukrasen Digal v. State of Odisha
Case brief
What is this about?
The petition was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner did not appear when the matter was called and no reasons were provided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
BLAPL No.6446 of 2022
Sukrasen Digal …. Petitioner None -versus- State of Odisha …. Opposite Party Mr. K.K. Gaya, ASC
CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH
ORDER
25.11.2022
Order No.
05. 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. None appears for the Petitioner, when the matter is called.
3. Accordingly, BLAPL stands dismissed for non-
prosecution.
(V. NARASINGH)
Judge
PKS
Page 1 of 1
Sukrasen Digal
State of Odisha
V. Narasimh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court