The High Court at Cuttack dismissed the petitioner's application for non-prosecution, having presumed lack of interest based on the petitioner's absence and previous adjournments.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
BLAPL No.626 of 2022
Sudhanya Biswas …. Petitioner
Mr. S. Mitra,
Advocate
-versus-
….
State of Odisha Opposite Party
Mr.P. Tripathy,
Addl. Standing Counsel
CORAM:
JUSTICE SASHIKANTA MISHRA
ORDER
02.9.2022.
Order No.
05. 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. None appears for the Petitioner. On the previous occasions
also the matter was adjourned.
3. Hence, it is presumed that the Petitioner is no longer
interested to pursue this application, which is, therefore,
dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Sashikanta Mishra)
AKB Judge
Page 1 of 1
// 2 //
Page 2 of 2
Sudhanya Biswas
State of Odisha
SASHIKANTA MISHRA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
