Bail application rejected under Section 439 Cr.P.C. as unacceptable due to grave accusations of murdering the petitioner's wife causing death by throttling neck supported by medical evidence and victim's son's statement.
Prayer for bail stands rejected; BLAPL disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
BLAPL No.5257 of 2022
Simanchal @ Manoj Gouda …. Petitioner M/s. S.G.Das , Advocate
-versus-
State of Orissa
…. Opp. Party M/s.R.Tripathy, A.S.C.
CORAM:
Order No.
JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY ORDER 07.12.2022
// 2 //
vividly described how the petitioner had killed the deceased, submits that the petitioner is the author of the crime. On the aforesaid submissions, learned counsel for the State prays to reject the bail application of the petitioner.
Kishore
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner accused of murdering his wife under Sections 302 and 304(B) IPC.
Whether the gravity of the offence and evidence justify the rejection of bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Simanchal @ Manoj Gouda
State of Orissa
G. Satpathy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
