In a bail petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C., the High Court refused a further adjournment to the State due to the investigating agency's neglect in producing the case diary and ordered the petitioner's release on bail.
Petitioner directed to be released on bail on terms to be fixed by the lower court; further adjournment to the State refused.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
BLAPL No. 4649 of 2021
Roshni Meher
…. Petitioner
Mr. D.P. Pattanaik, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha
…. Opposite Party
Ms. S. Mishra, ASC
CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH
ORDER
12.05.2022
Order No.
04.
Page 1 of 3
another adjournment on 03.11.2021. Today when the matter is called prayer is made on behalf of the State for adjournment to produce the Case Diary.
Page 2 of 3
(V. NARASINGH)
Judge
Santoshi
Page 3 of 3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant bail to the petitioner who is in custody pending trial for POCSO-related offences given the investigating agency's failure to produce the case diary.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Roshni Meher
State of Odisha
V. NARASINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
