The petitioner opposed to bail in a T.R. case under Section 21(b) of the NDPS Act argued for release due to delay in prosecution witness deposal. The High Court dismissed the bail application.
The BLAPL stands dismissed. The petition for release on bail is rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
BLAPL No.414 of 2022
Kiran Kumar Swain @ Silu
…. Petitioner
-versus-
State of Odisha
…. Opposite Party
CORAM: JUSTICE S. PUJAHARI
ORDER
Order No.
24.02.2022
learned counsel for the State-Opposite Party.
Page 1 of 2
// 2 //
DA
case.
6. Accordingly, the BLAPL stands dismissed.
(S. Pujahari)
Judge
Page 2 of 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be released on bail given the delay in the deposal of prosecution witnesses.
Whether the proceedings in the present bail petition should be allowed or dismissed.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kiran Kumar Swain @ Silu
State of Odisha
S. PUJARI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
