Dismissed

Seleru Simanchala@Simanchala Seleru v. State of Odisha

Orissa HC23 Dec 2022BLAPL/12780/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Orissa rejected the bail application filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. by the petitioner accused of dacoity. The court held that considering the gravity of the offence, the recovery of cash, and the ongoing investigation, bail was not warranted.

What did the court decide?

The bail application of the Petitioner is rejected, bearing in view the gravity of the offence and the materials appearing against the Petitioner.

Seleru Simanchala@Simanchala Seleru Vs State of Odisha — Bail and Remand | Orissa HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

¶2

BLAPL No.12780 of 2022

¶3

Seleru Simanchala @ Simanchala Seleru

¶4

Petitioner

¶5

Mr. S.K. Nayak, Advocate

¶6

-versus-

¶7

…. State of Orissa Opp. Party

¶8

Mr. M. Mishra, A.S.C.

¶9

CORAM:

¶10

JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY

ORDER

Order No.

23.12.2022

This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual /Physical Mode).

¶16

This is an application U/S. 439 of Cr.P.C. by the Petitioner for grant of bail in connection with Narayanpatna P.S. Case No.91 of 2022 corresponding to G.R. No. 420 of 2022 which is now transferred for trial as T.R. Case No. 121 of 2022 pending in the file of learned J.M.F.C., Laxmipur for commission of offences punishable U/S. 395 of IPC, on the allegation of committing dacoity of Rs. 4,20,000/- from the informant, along with co-accused persons.

¶17

In the course of hearing of the bail application, Mr. S.K. Nayak, learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that FIR has been lodged against co-accused Ramesh and Narrapa, but not against the present Petitioner and no T.I. Parade has been conducted to identify the Petitioner in this case and the materials appearing against the Petitioner are recovery cash of Rs. 1,98,000/- and confession of coaccused before the Police and, therefore, the Petitioner may kindly be granted on bail.

¶18

// 2 //

¶19

On the other hand, Mr. M. Mishra, learned A.S.C., vehemently opposes the bail application of the Petitioner and he inter-alia submits that cash of Rs. 1,98,000/- has been recovered at the instance of the Petitioner and, thereby, his bail application should not be considered favourably.

¶20

Considering the rival submissions made and taking into consideration the nature and gravity of accusations raised against the Petitioner as well as the gravity of offence and keeping in view that the investigation is going on, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the Petitioner.

¶21

Hence, the bail application of the Petitioner stands rejected.

¶22

Accordingly, the BLAPL stands disposed of.

¶23

Issue urgent certified copy of the order as per Rules.

¶24

( G. Satapathy)
Judge

¶25

Priyajit

Seleru Simanchala@Simanchala Seleru v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Seleru Simanchala@Simanchala Seleru v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kansa @ Ranjit Nayak Vs State of Odisha

Santosh Kumar Sahoo Vs State of Odisha

Pintu @ Biswajit Paltasingh Vs State of Odisha

Harasingh Mundary Vs State of Odisha

Sakta Mishra Vs Santosh Kumar Mishra

Manoj @ Sritam Naik Vs State of Odisha