Bhagyadhar Nayak @ Bhagyaban v. State of Odisha
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner filed a memo stating lack of instruction. The court disposed of the petition for want of instruction without deciding any substantive issue.
Petitioner filed a memo stating lack of instruction. The court disposed of the petition for want of instruction without deciding any substantive issue.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
BLAPL No.12597 of 2022
Bhagyadhar Nayak @ Bhagyaban
…. Petitioner
Mr.G. Madani, Advocate
-versus-
…. State of Orissa Opp. Party Mr. M. Mishra, ASC
CORAM:
JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY
ORDER
Order No.
22.12.2022
( G. Satapathy) Judge
Priyajit
Bhagyadhar Nayak @ Bhagyaban
State of Orissa
G. Satapathy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court