On application under S. 439 Cr.P.C., the High Court of Orissa granted bail to the petitioner for an offence of poaching a leopard, noting that a co-accused had already been admitted to bail.
Petitioner admitted to bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- each with two solvent sureties each for the like amount.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
BLAPL No.12387 of 2022
Ranjit Behera …. Petitioner Mr. M.K. Mohapatro, Advocate
-versus-
…. State of Orissa Opp. Party Mr. S.R. Roul, A.S.C.
CORAM:
JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY
Order No.
ORDER 23.12.2022
// 2 //
trial detention of the Petitioner as well as release of co-accused persons on bail, this Court admits the petitioner to bail.
It is clarified that the Court in seisin of the case will be at liberty
to cancel the bail of the Petitioner without further reference to this Court, if any of the above conditions are violated or a case for cancellation of bail is otherwise made out.
Priyajit
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner charged with poaching a leopard under S. 51 of the Wild Life Protection Act.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Ranjit Behera
State of Orissa
G. Satpathy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
